LIVE
News

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2: Is the Battery Boost Worth the Premium Price?

CNET’s review of the Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 identifies two practical upgrades over the previous Ultra: a larger 800 mAh battery and Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Wear Elite processor.

Meredith Kline·updated August 04, 2026

Samsung Galaxy Watch Ultra 2: Is the Battery Boost Worth the Premium Price?

The result is a more capable Wear OS watch for outdoor use, but the $700 price, bulky 47mm case and premium positioning make the buying decision highly dependent on how you use a smartwatch.

For buyers who need longer endurance without moving to a dedicated sports watch, the Ultra 2 is the most relevant Galaxy Watch to examine. If you mainly need notifications, sleep tracking and everyday fitness features, the cheaper Galaxy Watch 9 may provide much of the same experience.

Battery life is the main reason to upgrade

Samsung increased the battery capacity from 590 mAh in the first Galaxy Watch Ultra to 800 mAh in the Ultra 2. CNET recorded around 50 hours of use during three weeks of testing with the always-on display enabled, including two full days and nights. That is below Samsung’s 60-hour claim, but the reviewer noted that endurance appeared to improve as the watch learned usage habits.

The practical benefit is not just fewer charging sessions. Longer battery life makes overnight sleep tracking and extended trail runs easier to manage. You will still need to configure the display mode carefully: switching from always-on to raise-to-wake should extend runtime further, although CNET did not measure the exact improvement.

This remains a different proposition from Garmin’s Fenix line, which can last a week or more on a charge. The Ultra 2 is instead positioned between a conventional smartwatch and a dedicated sports watch: more capable outdoors than Samsung’s standard lineup, but not designed to replace the strongest endurance-focused models.

Faster processing makes hands-free features more useful

The second major change is the move from Samsung’s Exynos chip to Qualcomm’s Snapdragon Wear Elite processor. CNET found that the combination of the new processor and larger battery made power-intensive AI features, including raise-to-talk Gemini, feel seamless in hands-free use.

The review specifically describes using Gemini to pull up recipes and check whether food had expired without reaching for a phone. Pinch and flick gestures also support hands-free operation, although those controls are not new to this model.

That improvement matters most if you regularly use voice commands or want to interact with the watch while exercising, cooking or carrying equipment. It is less compelling if your smartwatch use is limited to alerts and basic activity tracking. We can bypass the premium processor argument if those functions are not part of your routine; the battery and outdoor durability then become the more important checks.

Durable hardware, but the size is not a minor detail

The Ultra 2 retains the titanium case used by its predecessor, while the standard Galaxy Watch uses aluminum. It also has a scratch-resistant sapphire crystal display, a 1.5-inch screen that has grown to 1.52 inches, and the largest and brightest display in the Galaxy Watch lineup, according to the review.

Samsung made the body thinner and lighter than the previous Ultra while keeping the 47mm format. CNET still describes the watch as bigger and bulkier than a typical everyday wearable, particularly for a 6.5-inch wrist. That is the point to check before purchase: reduced thickness does not change the basic size of the watch.

The durability specification is a strong part of the package. The watch is rated IP68 for water and dust resistance and 10ATM, and CNET considers it one of the more durable Wear OS watches available for outdoor activity. However, durability does not remove the trade-off in comfort or price.

The practical conclusion is narrow but clear. Choose the Galaxy Watch Ultra 2 if you want a Wear OS smartwatch with substantially better Galaxy Watch battery life, stronger outdoor credentials and faster hands-free interaction. Do not pay $700 simply for a larger watch if you only need everyday smartwatch functions; in that case, CNET points to the Galaxy Watch 9 as a lower-cost alternative. Before buying, check the 47mm fit, decide whether always-on display endurance is sufficient, and compare your needs with a dedicated sports watch if weeklong battery life is the priority.